Jose y Maria, Everett Patterson. |
Yesterday, I came
across the story of a church in the Netherlands that has been holding a service nonstop for a month.
Are they trying
to make it into the Guinness Book of World Records for the longest church
service? Nope. It’s a spiritual filibuster.
An Armenian
family that secured conditional asylum in the Netherlands in 2010 has had its
request for full political asylum denied and is now at risk of being deported.
It appears that sending them home would create a dangerous situation for the
family, which had received death threats over the husband and father’s
political activism. What type of activism he was engaging in isn’t altogether
clear, but Armenia had been under the grip of an authoritarian government for
most of the past two decades. If he was speaking truth to power, we can guess
that he was being unjustly persecuted, just as all who speak truth to power
have always been, from Christ himself on down through the ages.
Bethel Church in
the Hague welcomed the family inside its walls back in late October, and more
than 450 faith leaders from across the Netherlands have lent a hand since then
to keep the service going. By law, immigration officials aren’t allowed to
enter a place of worship while a religious service is in session. So as long as
the service continues, the family is safe. The church says its goal is to buy
time for the family until a humane solution can be agreed upon.
“We want to love
God and our neighbor,” says Theo Hettema, chairman of the General Council of
Protestant Ministers in the Netherlands. “And we thought this was a clear
opportunity to put the love for our neighbor into reality.”
How refreshing to
hear of a church actively helping rather than condemning, welcoming in rather
than pushing out, living out the words of Christ rather than making excuses for
why they don’t apply.
The parallels to other contemporary world events is all too clear. For example, when American
Christians see migrants coming to our southern border, far too many take a
stance that’s indifferent or hostile.
“Let them come
back legally.”
“They shouldn’t
put their kids at risk.”
“They just want
to steal our jobs and live off our system.”
“They’re
criminals.”
“They’re
animals.”
These words are
quite simply at odds with the words of Jesus, who said things like this:
“Blessed are the
merciful, for they will be shown mercy.”
“Do unto others
as you would want them to do unto you.”
“You
shall love the Lord your God with all your heart
and with all your soul and with all your mind. This is the
great and first commandment. And a second is like it: You shall love your
neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets.”
“I was a stranger
and you welcomed me.”
“Whatsoever you
do for the least of these my brethren, you do for me.”
Indeed, the
lesson of the parable of the Good Samaritan was that our neighbor is anyone in
need, regardless of standing, nationality, religion, or anything else.
We might
say we need to take care of our own first, but it doesn’t have to be an
either-or.
We might ask which of us will take these migrant families in, but
that’s the same argument pro-choicers use against pro-lifers – “If you force
people to have babies, are you going to adopt them?” – and it rings just as
hollow.
We don’t have to do everything, but we can all
do something. Turning our backs on those in need, especially
when many of them have ended up at our borders as a result of our own foreign
policy, is cruel, inhumane, and most certainly anti-Christian.
The Old Testament
is rife with admonitions to the Israelites to not mistreat the foreigners in
their midst, for they were once foreigners in Egypt. In Jeremiah, God is even
more explicit: “I will be merciful only if you cease your evil thoughts and
deeds and treat each other with justice; only if you do not oppress the
alien, the orphan, and the widow; only if you cease murdering; only if you do
not seek out other gods to your own harm. Then I will allow you to stay in this
land that I gave to your ancestors forever.”
And the sin of
Sodom? Not sodomy. Ezekiel 16:49 sets the record straight. “Now this was
the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed, and
unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy.”
In short, the God
of the Bible really doesn’t mince words regarding where he stands on treating
those in need, including foreigners. That’s because need knows no borders. Only
when nationalism trumps allegiance to the Gospels could we even think of
denying help to those who need it simply because they fall outside an invisible
borderline.
Why is this
relevant to Advent? Because if Mary and Joseph were traveling today, they could
very well be a poor couple denied accommodations for any specious reason –
maybe because they were brown, maybe because they looked like trouble, maybe
because they could be criminals. If that seems far-fetched, consider that
this is essentially what we’re telling the migrants at our
borders. There’s no room for you here. You’re not our problem. Go
somewhere else.
It’s also
relevant to Advent because of how Mary and Joseph eventually had to flee their homeland for the safety of their child.
The parallels to today are glaringly obvious.
So until we can
see the faces of Mary, Joseph, and Jesus in those at our doorstep, we have
failed to care for the least of these. That’s a lesson we all need to take to
heart if, like Mary, we wish to birth Christ and his Good News into the
world.
Post settings Labels Published on 12/3/18, 10:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time Permalink Location Search Description Options
No comments:
Post a Comment